Category Archives: Press

City Meetings – Bike Parking and SuperBlock development project

City Council scheduled to move forward on Bicycle Parking Facilities

At tonights meeting , City Council is due to move forward on the plan for the Grant-Funded Bicycle Parking Facilities in Parking Structures 7 & 8 at just under $1.4 million dollars.
See tonights agenda here.  Staff report here.
Here is an excerpt of the staff report concerning this project:

Background

The City’s Downtown Urban Design Plan adopted in 1997 emphasizes balancing the streets to accommodate mixed modes of traffic, making streets bicycle-friendly, and providing bicycle parking throughout downtown with activated storefronts to enliven the pedestrian experience.  The City’s Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) adopted this year identifies an increase in bicycling as necessary for the City to reach its goals of reducing auto trips, meeting its greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments, and promoting active living.  Facilities listed in the LUCE to support increased bicycling include secure bike parking and bicycle-transit centers with additional amenities such as showers and repair services.

Is this really the beginning of what we’ve been asking for?  It’s certainly a start.  I have to wonder what happened to the initially proposed plan that included Parking Structure #2. That would ultimately seem to have been better because it afforded facilities at both ends of the of the Promenade.  We can add that to our wish list.

Tomorrow night, Major Santa Monica Development,
SuperBlock at the old PaperMate Site

Wednesday night, City officials will hold a public meeting at Virginia Avenue Park at 7pm to discuss the Bergamot Transit Village Center Project. Officials are set to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the mixed-use village comprised of creative arts, residential and retail uses on the site of the old PaperMate Plant .  The Development Agreement from a special meeting of the Cities Planning Commission back in January can be found here in section 5-A.

See the article in the todays LookOut News, which describes in more detail the sheer magnitude of this project and how it will likely impact this already congested area.

I paraphrase what Allison Kendall, of Kendall Planning + Design recently had this to say about this the proposed project.

This PaperMate site is enormous, and nearly as critical to bicycle and pedestrian access to the Expo station as the Agensys site.  …..Currently, the fact that the current development doesn’t include a sidewalk on Olympic and forces a strange geometry on the 26th and Olympic intersection means lots of high speed car traffic and danger for both pedestrians and cyclists, especially those coming South down 26th to Bergamot station , ….

Inserting 1 million square feet of mixed use development onto an area which already has some of the worst congestion in the city will call for some amazingly effective disincentives to driving and amenities for other modes.  A full scale BikeStation and bike sharing/rental facility, plus showers, widened and improved bike lanes in all directions, major subdivisions of the “superblock” and onsite eating and retail might be among the amenities.

There is also an obvious need to provide frequent future transit service along 26th and probably Stewart as well to serve the Expo station and the transit village.  Amenities for transit riders and provision of free monthly Metro or BBB passes to all employees and residents provided by employers or building owners should be a requirement—this was very effective in Santa Clara County with the “EcoPass”.

It’s also been noted that it’s not just the sheer volume of parking but the fact that parking costs are “bundled” into housing unit costs rather than paid for as an amenity by car owners.  This drives up the cost of the units for all tenants regardless of whether they have a car or not and does nothing to promote the car free lifestyle the city has stated they want to support.

Come out to hear first hand what the city has planned with this SuperBlock project and how they propose handling the congestion it will surely bring to the surrounding area.  Will the city make good on all the talk about committing to active living and bicycle infrastructure?

Wednesday at 7 p.m. at Virginia Avenue Park.

Cyclists Gaining Momentum

Cyclists gaining momentum for planning push

Article in todays Daily Press (SMDP) regarding the December 13th meeting as the first of several public meetings that will be held to discuss Santa Monica’s new Bicycle Action Plan.  The article also highlights what official believe are a series of recent moves that demonstrate their commitment to working with cyclist.
So far what we’ve seen has been mostly all talk…. but talk is good if it actually goes somewhere.

Also mentioned in the article is the new position we have long been pushing for:

As of Wednesday, City Hall for the first time has a staff member who will serve as the point person for the city’s bicycle planning efforts in Transportation Planning Manager Lucy Dyke

Read more on December 13th meeting, it is important to give your input, hope to see you there.

Click to read the full article “Cyclist gain momentum for planning push” SMDP

CR

Subject: SMPD Bike Patrol

Letter to the Editor, SMDP

From: Roger Swanson

SMPD Bike Patrol: Sunday Ride at the Beach?

On Sunday, November 14 at 1:35 PM, a friend and I rode behind two members of the SMPD Bike Patrol on the beach bike path south of the Pier. This was my first encounter with the Bike Patrol since moving to Santa Monica 12 years ago. In over 500 rides on the Santa Monica portion of the bike path, this was a first! So, I took some photos with my cellphone camera.
That’s the good news.
Now, the bad: The attached photos show the Bike Patrol completely ignoring the pedestrians on the beach bike path. In the background is a parallel, and separate, pedestrian walkway, the Beach Promenade. One must conclude that the inaction of the Bike Patrol means this portion of the bike path is a shared bikeway where pedestrians are allowed, according to the Santa Monica Municipal Code (Public Safety) 3.12.550 – Bike-path and beach promenade.
OK, shared bikeway.
SM MC 3.12.550 also says: “All persons riding bicycles on the bike-path shall comply with all lawful signs and directional markings, including, but not limited to, painted directional arrows, bike-path route boundaries, and signs designating permissible travel lanes.”
Did I miss the signage and the travel lanes?
Maybe a shared bikeway with poor signage?
On the other hand, if it is a true bike path, then CA Vehicle Code Section 21966 – Pedestrian in Bicycle Lane applies:No pedestrian shall proceed along a bicycle path or lane where there is an adjacent adequate pedestrian facility.” As far as I can tell, there is an adjacent adequate pedestrian facility
So, which is it, 1) shared bikeway with poor signage, or 2) a bike path with pedestrians?

Now the irony: If riding bikes on sidewalks is a public safety issue (and prohibited by SM MC (Public Safety) 3.12.540 – Bicycle riding and coasting restricted), then why are pedestrians on a bike path not a public safety issue? The beach bike path looks like a sidewalk to me.
I really hope the Bike Patrol promoted public safety elsewhere on Sunday.

And here what appears to be the resulting article:
Equal treatment under the law

quote from the article:

“What we’re concerned about is the presence of a double standard, one that cannot stand. If the Santa Monica Police Department is going to be aggressive in ticketing bikers on sidewalks (which it should), officers should be equally vigilant about ticketing pedestrians on the bike path. On our ride we were behind two officers on bikes and watched as they failed to cite or even talk with pedestrians, this despite the fact that the path was packed with peds and their kids, some of whom were left unsupervised to swerve in opposing lanes. This would have been a perfect time to raise awareness that the bike path is for bicycles.

People need to be more responsible and respect the law, and that includes cyclists who fail to stop at stop signs or ride without lights at night. And the police department needs to stop the selective enforcement. City Hall needs to live up to its reputation as being bike and pedestrian friendly. Right now, the bike path is neither.

Meet the Candidates

This Thursday October 7,  6.30pm 8:45pm*

Santa Moncia Spoke is hosting an evening to
Meet the Candidates

An informal “Social Mixer” to meet and talk to Santa Monica City Council candidates.

©CynthiaRose

We want your comments and ideas… Lets TALK BIKES!

It’s a no speeches, up close talk with City Council Candidates about Bikes and Santa Monica.

Bring your questions, ideas, comments…. or just come and listen!

Click here to RSVP :

Converse with the candidates, hear their thoughts on Santa Monica.

Current list of attending Candidates:

Kevin McKeown
Terry O’Day
Bob Holbrook
Jon Mann
David Ganezer
Susan Hartley
Jerry Rubin

Regrets: Pam O’Connor (out of town), Gleam Davis (back to school night), Robert Kronovert (out of town)

*Snacks and refreshments will be served. Plenty of secure bike parking in the enclosed Patio.

And please, tell all our friends in the community, tell all your friends.  We look forward to seeing you!

Where: 502 Colorado, (south east corner 5th and Colorado)

When: This Thursdy, October 7th from 6:30- 8:45 pm

See you all there!

Save the Date, Thursday evening 10/7

Santa Monica Spoke

Informal meet and greet,  social mixer
6:30 – 9 pm
We want your comments and ideas!  Let’s talk BIKES!

Speak to City Council candidates on their views of biking in Santa Monica

Snacks and Beverages will be served

—————————————————————————————–

6:30 pm, 502 Colorado Ave (corner of 5th & Colorado)