Author Archives: Richard McKinnon

Santa Monica needs Bike Parking now.

Santa Monica Daily Press

by Richard McKinnon
29 April.

Locking my bike to the steel chair on the Third Street Promenade just outside Old Navy (and intent on walking inside for the usual spending spree) I was halted by a city enforcer.

“Sir, the police will clip the lock off and charge you $300,” this “Ambassador of good will” instructed me, continuing, “We’ve been told to make sure bikes are only attached to the provided bike racks.”

Any man in a straw hat, snappy slogan stitched into his blue shirt breast, holding a clipboard, and using a clear wire device for back-to-base communication (at all times) is not to be trifled with.

So we looked around.

There are plenty of trees, seats or railings on the promenade, but only 25 inverted U-shaped bike racks or 50 parking spaces for bikes. They’re dotted down the three-block-long promenade, (i.e. nine racks or 18 spots in the Old Navy block) which is lined by hundreds of shops and to service the shops, surrounded by six major parking structures, some six stories high with signs galore to advertise them. On-street parking is available, too.

Something’s wrong with this picture, for bike rider and retailer alike, isn’t it?

Think of all those energetic cyclists, many young, virile and cashed up, casually booted off the promenade and by implication, told to drive. Think of all the empty nesters on cruisers scanning the streets for room to lock up their bikes. Think of anyone with a bike, at home, dissuaded from Santa Monica’s Downtown because there’s nowhere to park, or park safely. If I was a retailer I’d be ranting at City Hall.

In response, you will be told, there’s 1,600 spots coming in the new Santa Monica Place parking station. Good idea. Good for the mall. Great for the light rail when it comes.

And, yes, there are bike parking racks inside the current parking structures.

But the whole thing about the bike is that it’s flexible, a way of getting around town that shrinks distance and makes mobility an easy option for everyone. Bikes lock up where they need to go, and then move on. And what’s the point of just having bike parking at a distance and then walking? It’s all about having a mix of options.

Learning that the promenade was astonishingly starved of bike racks you might begin to think, and wonder where else Downtown needs bike parking but doesn’t have it? As it turns out, pretty much everywhere.

For example; the Lululemon shop that sells active gear — no racks. REI — no racks, although they sell lots of bikes. And bikes crowd their entry rails. Bike Performance — no racks.

Bay Cities Deli? You know, where they have a security guard directing parkers inside the lot, and a line of waiting traffic that disrupts Lincoln Boulevard, sometimes as far back as Interstate 10. Nothing. (The two trees outside are often surrounded by bikes to capacity.) Swingers? Anisette? Nothing.

In fact, you’re struggling to find bike racks in the downtown area. There’s complete imbalance between the demand, high and growing, and the supply, little or none.

Those Farmers’ Market throngs? Organic, slow food, good living, green type people? Sorry about your cycles.

The library? Two full racks night and day. But here City Hall has plans to take out some of their lightly used car parking to put in a corral of bike racks. (A corral is where a car spot is removed and a rack for 10 to 11 bikes installed). This could be an elegant solution for all over the city.

City Hall has already trialed an on-street corral; it’s outside the homeless shelter on Olympic Boulevard. Clearly the powers that be think the homeless use bikes. They do. It’s just so do the rest of us.

Smart cities around the U.S. now routinely use corrals (Portland, Tucson, Columbia, Missouri … wait, Missouri? Couldn’t we then?).

Another bike parking option is those 6,000 old style parking meters that clock up revenue relentlessly. Why not convert some to bike parking with an easy add of a little metal here and there?

When a recent parking study hit, the City Council agreed revenue from increased parking fees would be set aside (hypothicated) for alternate parking management.

Now while bikes aren’t alternate at all, the idea that an expansive, quick move to hugely more and different bike spots would benefit social and street life, develop the retail base of the city in new ways and allow residents better and more consistent access to Downtown might be.

Still, given the 10,000 existing parking spots for cars, let’s pick a round number for our immediate new bike parking.

Let’s say 1,000 spots.

And lets say, by years end.

It's Bike Time Santa Monica!

image

March 30, 2010

Last Sunday, the Los Angeles Marathon came to Santa Monica. Sunday was the day the cars came as well, and ate Downtown dead. Santa Monica was jammed solid (Saturday, too).

And the weekend before? Jammed as well, and really, pretty much every weekend you can name.

On any given day, you’ll find it hard to cram another car onto the Downtown roads. Main Street often inches slowly nowhere. Everyone who lives here or visits for a minute knows it.

Eventually, the light rail may help. It might drag some visitors to public transport but that’s not any time in the next four years. It’ll hold back the growth of cars and bring more visitors on foot. And it’s a big shift in thinking about how to get people to and from Santa Monica.

We need more of that.

But really, we need bikes. Lots and lots of bikes. An explosion of bikes, and bike thinking.

Bikes imply a different way of living in our city.

Bikes imply a rather more untroubled, accessible at all times, street life. They bring a city together. They make retail accessible again. The mobility of a bike extends the distance shoppers will travel. You couldn’t introduce a bike culture into just anywhere in Southern California tomorrow. But you can in Santa Monica. We are ready. We just need the will.

Santa Monica is geographically perfect because it’s basically flat, the weather’s perfect all but a few days a year, and the city’s compact.

The issue is what comes first? The infrastructure? Or the people riding? Current consensus political thinking is we should point to the riders. Then, sir, we can move on to the infrastructure.

Well, there are plenty of riders already.

Count bike valet numbers at the Sunday Main Street Farmers’ Market; 400, 600, or more.

Count bike numbers on streets like Broadway any time of the day or night. Riders just appear. Ones and twos, on every known version of ordinary commuter bike, going about their business because bikes are convenient.

Broadway has become a strikingly useful bike boulevard bringing residents and visitors to Downtown from the “far extremes” (what, four miles or so?) of Santa Monica and West L.A. efficiently and easily. It dramatizes what we miss everywhere else.

At the Santa Monica Pier’s centennial celebration, bike numbers were off the charts. Bikes were tied up everywhere, to everything. Just like most days on Main Street. Near Urth Café, bikes are locked to a chain fence, to electrical wires, wherever. Any special day in Santa Monica now has bikes as the go-to option for many residents. Every day your see the Lycra exercisers, the hard core, the commuters, the tourists, the kids moving quietly around town, everyone.

Most people around town will own up to possessing a bike.

They’re just worried about using it often.

Biking should be easy and safe. At the moment in Santa Monica, it’s not really either.

It’s not easy, because there really isn’t enough bike parking; it’s generally not close to where riders need to go; there’s not enough bikes lanes; the lanes often disappear and certainly don’t join up; the beach isn’t connected to any other lane or Downtown; bike lanes aren’t quite wide enough. Signs don’t tell road users enough about bike users sharing roads.

Oh, the list goes on and on, most things fairly easy to address and at relatively small cost.

Safety is related to easy. Ride down Fifth Street any morning and it’s better than a seven coffee heart starter as car doors open without warning in the door zone; cars barge into the street; cars block Santa Monica Boulevard at the intersection; people step into the road without looking, drivers careen around wildly.

Safety is a function of accepting that bikes have a clear place on our roads and in our city and should be protected and encouraged. Again, relatively small steps will bring big results.

Because just riding a bike is not unsafe.

And bike riders are out there, even if hidden in plain sight. They are simply awaiting permission to rise up and start a new wave of street and city usership.

New York created hundreds of miles of bike lanes in the last 24 months. Bike numbers soared. Closer to home, Long Beach has signed contracts to build miles of bike lanes within eight weeks, as well as the first bike boulevard in Southern California. Long Beach!

Shouldn’t it be Santa Monica that’s first in the nation on street and urban issues?

There are 6,000 parking meters in Santa Monica and 10,000 parking spots in garages the city owns around Downtown. That’s a lot of conventional wisdom, investment and vested interest in the way it’s been done.

But, it’s time, time to make Santa Monica safe and easy for bikes, time to get a new urbanism going that stresses people and streets rather than cars and structures. It’s time to get Santa Monica businesses whole new markets, consumers and economic development. It’s time to chart new ideas into the city and quickly. Time indeed.

It’s bike time.